1. Define migration scope
- List applications, services, certificates, gateways, and infrastructure sources in scope.
- Identify business-critical systems and externally exposed paths.
- Record owners for each system and policy area.
Use this planning structure to turn PQC concern into a governed migration program with clear scope, owners, phases, remediation work, approved exception handling, and evidence milestones.
Use these prompts in a planning document or working session. The goal is to produce a first governed baseline, not a perfect enterprise-wide inventory.
What migration outcome are you trying to prove in the first 30-60 days?
Which applications, services, certificates, gateways, and infrastructure sources will be baselined first?
Who owns policy, remediation, approved exceptions, and evidence for each scoped system?
Which controls start report-only, which warn, and which are allowed to fail delivery workflows?
Which findings must be fixed first, who owns them, and what dependency or target date controls the work?
What rationale, affected scope, approving policy context, expiry, and review cadence are required?
Which baseline snapshot, policy version, evaluation records, and review summary will prove progress?
When will security, platform, risk, and leadership review status and decide whether to expand scope?
Crypto Posture helps teams turn the plan into an operating workflow: select a policy template, enroll one application or service, baseline current compliance status, and produce the first evidence snapshot.